Skip to main content
· 9/18/2023

In Re: The State of Texas, Ex Rel. Bill D. Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state’s taxing jurisdiction over non-member Indians is equivalent to state’s taxing jurisdiction over non-Indians
  • holding that a tribe may tax members entering the reservation to engage in economic activity
  • holding that “tribal sovereignty is dependent on, and subordinate to, only the Federal Government, not the States”
  • recognizing that a tribe had power to impose tax on cigarettes sold to non-members on the reservation
  • concluding that a state lacked authority to impose a motor vehicle excise tax upon a tribe and its members when the tax was not “tailored to the amount of actual off-reservation use”
  • holding that a state could require reservation “smoke shops” to collect state sales tax from non-Indian customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.