Skip to main content
· 5/12/2011

In re the Recall of Washam

Citations

  • 171 Wash. 2d 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court must perform choice-of-law analysis when parties’ choice of FAA is plausibly ineffective by operation of transportation worker exception
  • observing that there is no language in the FAA that “explicitly preempts the enforcement of state arbitration statutes”
  • observing that “no binding precedent requires district courts to ignore arbitrability under state law when the applicability of § 1 is uncertain”
  • observing that there is no language in the FAA that “explicitly preempts the enforcement of state arbitration statutes”
  • observing that “no binding precedent requires district courts to ignore arbitrability under state law when the applicability of § 1 is uncertain”
  • establishing a three-part framework for challenges to arbitrability under § 1, requiring a district court first to address whether the § 1 exemption applies before considering the applicability of any alternative state law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.