· 5/12/2011
In re the Recall of Washam
Citations
- 171 Wash. 2d 503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court must perform choice-of-law analysis when parties’ choice of FAA is plausibly ineffective by operation of transportation worker exception
- observing that there is no language in the FAA that “explicitly preempts the enforcement of state arbitration statutes”
- observing that “no binding precedent requires district courts to ignore arbitrability under state law when the applicability of § 1 is uncertain”
- observing that there is no language in the FAA that “explicitly preempts the enforcement of state arbitration statutes”
- observing that “no binding precedent requires district courts to ignore arbitrability under state law when the applicability of § 1 is uncertain”
- establishing a three-part framework for challenges to arbitrability under § 1, requiring a district court first to address whether the § 1 exemption applies before considering the applicability of any alternative state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst, Johnson, Madsen, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.