Skip to main content
· 3/2/2012

In Re the Protective Proceedings of Tammy J.

Citations

  • 270 P.3d 805
  • 2012 Alas. LEXIS 39
  • 2012 WL 676369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying “personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education” as among the fundamental rights protected by substantive due process (quoting Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 573-74 (2003))
  • “[A] pro se litigant who fails to raise an issue below should not be able to raise the issue on appeal absent plain error.” (quoting Maness v. Daily, 184 P.3d 1, 9 n.25 (Alaska 2008))
  • \[A] pro se litigant who fails to raise an issue below should not be able to raise the issue on appeal absent plain error.\ (quoting Maness v. Daily, 184 P.3d 1, 9 n. 25 (Alaska 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carpeneti, Fabe, Winfree, Christen, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.