In re the Postsentence Review of Hudgens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the dismissal of the ex-spouse’s motion seeking alimony because the “critical issue” before the court “was precisely the same issue” previously adjudicated and was essential to the previous judgment
• legal and factual determination ex-spouse was not contractually entitled to alimony expressly decided in prior summary judgment and thus barred by collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).