In Re The Paternity of J.T. and I.T., Minor Children and In Re The Support of C.R.T., Minor Child R.A.P., Mother v. C.D.T., Father

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “the trial court is not, absent a request by a party, required to make special findings” pursuant to Trial Rule 52
• noting Mother “engaged in continuing pattern' of denial of parenting to time to [Father]” for over two years and despite multiple contempt petitions against Mother
• “[A] trial court is not, absent a request by a party, required to make special findings regarding the continuing and substantial changes in the parties’ circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).