· 9/29/1995
In Re the Paternity of \Adam\
Citations
- 903 P.2d 207
- 273 Mont. 351
- 52 State Rptr. 1026
- 1995 Mont. LEXIS 222
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the best interest of the child was the proper standard to apply in determining whether blood tests should be conducted
- holding that the best interest of the child was the proper standard to apply in determining whether blood tests should be conducted
- probability that putative father was biological father was important but not controlling consideration in paternity action, but rather best interest of child was proper standard to apply in determining whether to declare paternity
- probability that putative father was biological father was important but not controlling consideration in paternity action, but rather best interest of child was proper standard to apply in determining whether to declare paternity
- paternity action by putative father; court held it was not in child’s best interests to declare paternity in putative father, where, among other things, putative father had no contact with child and had demonstrated no personal commitment to child
- paternity action by putative father; court held it was not in child's best interests to declare paternity in putative father, where, among other things, putative father had no contact with child and had demonstrated no personal commitment to child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray, Hunt, Leaphart, Trieweiler, Turnage
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.