Skip to main content
· 12/29/1911

In re the Minnesota Phonograph Co.

Citations

  • 148 A.D. 56
  • 132 N.Y.S. 1063
  • 1911 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the application of the doctrine of dependent relative revocation to the deceased’s will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.