In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 1 does not require findings on best-interests factors
• explaining that a district 4 court is not required to make express best-interests findings when modifying parenting time
• noting that Minn. Stat. § 518.17 , subd. 1(a), did not address parenting time
• noting, in case involving restriction of parenting time, that district court made numerous findings relevant to child’s best interests
• making this observation regarding the 2014 versions of Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1, and Minn. Stat. § 518.175, subd. 5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).