Skip to main content
· 6/29/2006

In Re the Marriage of Yates

Citations

  • 148 P.3d 304
  • 2006 Colo. App. LEXIS 1007
  • 2006 WL 1766848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was in the best interests of the children for one party to participate in anger management counseling
  • holding that husband lacked standing to challenge division of marital property when he filed bankruptcy petition after appeal because the appellate rights became the property of the trustee
  • noting that “child abuse or spousal abuse” are “but two, albeit important, factors in assessing the best interests of the child”
  • noting that the “determination of a spouse’s reasonable needs is dependent on the particular facts and circumstances of the marriage”
  • noting that mother’s conviction for misdemeanor child abuse was based on menacing father with a knife in front of children
  • upholding an order imputing income based on the only evidence available when the party’s financial disclosures were “atrocious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy, Taubman, Loeb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.