In Re the Marriage of Wormell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring district court to make certain specific findings under section 14-10-114 t o apprise the parties of the reasons for its decision and to pre serve its rationale for any appellate review
• noting husband was not entitled to share in the future appreciation of the marital residence awarded to wife because property is valued at the time of the dissolution hearing or as of the hearing on property division, whichever occurs first
• “[T]he mechanism employed by the court for dividing the marital estate is a matter within the trial court’s discretion.”
• “[H]usband is not entitled to share in the home’s future appreciation because property is valued at the time of the dissolution hearing or as of the hearing on property division, whichever occurs first.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).