Skip to main content
· 7/10/1998

In Re the Marriage of Whipp

Citations

  • 962 P.2d 1058
  • 265 Kan. 500
  • 1998 Kan. LEXIS 400
  • 1998 WL 388818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that for relocations that materially change circumstances to justify change in custody, court must determine whether change is in child’s best interests
  • \[A]n appellate court should only look to evidence supporting the decision of the trial court and determine if there was an abuse of discretion.\
  • although district court is not required to explain its reason for dividing property the way it did, when party objects to division, district court must then explain its reasoning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.