In Re the Marriage of Valerie E. Hute F/K/A Valerie E. Baker and Joseph M. Baker Upon the Petition of Valerie E. Hute F/K/A Valerie E. Baker, and Concerning Joseph M. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “routine[]” practice consistent with existing precedent provided an “arguable basis” for an “assertion of jurisdiction” (cleaned up)
• holding that a dismissal 1 were prolix; suit ultimately dismissed after plaintiff failed to cure any defect upon 2 amendment
• holding that a dismissal 27 without prejudice by a magistrate judge, issued before the defendant filed a consent to 1 amendment
• holding that a dismissal 1 were prolix; suit ultimately dismissed after plaintiff failed to cure any defect upon 2 amendment
• holding that a dismissal without prejudice by a magistrate judge, issued before the defendant filed a consent to 27 magistrate jurisdiction, is still a strike under the PLRA.
• holding that a dismissal without prejudice by a magistrate judge, issued before the defendant filed a consent to 27 magistrate jurisdiction, is still a strike under the PLRA.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).