Skip to main content
· 10/2/1989

In Re the Marriage of Udis

Citations

  • 780 P.2d 499
  • 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1210
  • 1989 Colo. LEXIS 292
  • 1989 WL 112921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that an appellate court may presume that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
  • holding agreed maintenance provision, which provided for “readjust[ment] as 20 agreed between the parties or determined by the Court,” authorized trial court to modify contractual maintenance provision on ground of unconscionability
  • presuming that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
  • presuming that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
  • presuming that the district court considered all the evidence in reaching its decision
  • explaining language in contractual maintenance provision authorized judicial modification on ground of unconscionability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirshbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.