· 10/2/1989
In Re the Marriage of Udis
Citations
- 780 P.2d 499
- 13 Brief Times Rptr. 1210
- 1989 Colo. LEXIS 292
- 1989 WL 112921
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an appellate court may presume that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
- holding agreed maintenance provision, which provided for “readjust[ment] as 20 agreed between the parties or determined by the Court,” authorized trial court to modify contractual maintenance provision on ground of unconscionability
- presuming that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
- presuming that the court considered all the evidence presented when arriving at its decision
- presuming that the district court considered all the evidence in reaching its decision
- explaining language in contractual maintenance provision authorized judicial modification on ground of unconscionability
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirshbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.