In Re the Marriage of Stachofsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a decision to award wife a portion of husband’s separate property
• remand unnecessary because trial court clearly indicated it would not have changed its 50/50 division of the stock even if it had been mischaracterized
• where the court used the granting date and not the date of employment when the option at issue was granted subsequent to the spouse's employment and the first segment to vest after the parties were found to be living separate and apart was also the first segment to vest under the grant
• where the court used the granting date and not the date of employment when the option at issue was granted subsequent to the spouse’s employment and the first segment to vest after the parties were found to be living separate and apart was also the first segment to vest under the grant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).