Skip to main content
· 4/1/1991

In Re the Marriage of Schenck

Citations

  • 228 Cal. App. 3d 1474
  • 279 Cal. Rptr. 651
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2460
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 3783
  • 1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is obvious that interests which are subject to creditors’ remedies must necessarily be considered.”
  • civil law and motion 6 department had no authority to order the sale of the family home 7 based on husband's accrued support arrearages when the family law 8 court still had jurisdiction to divide the community interest in 9 that home
  • civil law and motion 6 department had no authority to order the sale of the family home 7 based on husband's accrued support arrearages when the family law 8 court still had jurisdiction to divide the community interest in 9 that home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scotland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.