In Re the Marriage of Schelp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the five-year retention provision applies when a party's disclosures did not comply with the new heightened disclosure requirements of the rule
• noting that C.R.C.P. 16.2(e) “shift[s] the responsibility for omissions or misstatements” from the receiving party to the disclosing party
• stating that spouses are in a fiduciary relationship with one another
• The text of the post-decree property allocation provision “explicitly refers to the new affirmative disclosure requirements.”
• “The five-year retention provision states that for any disclosures made under the 29 new [Rule 16.2], the court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of five years after the entry a decree to reallocate assets and liabilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).