Skip to main content
· 5/13/2024

In re the Marriage of: Sarah Mae DeVille v. Darren Lee Hickey

Syllabus

In this post-marital-dissolution dispute, appellant-father argues that the district court erred by (1) granting respondent-mother's motion for conduct-based attorney fees; (2) denying father's motion to remove the parenting consultant; (3) denying father's motion to remove the parenting-consultant process from the dissolution judgment and decree; and (4) denying father's motion to divide child-related tax benefits between the parties. We affirm.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.