In re the Marriage of Routt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that by failing to consider medical reports submitted in state workers’ compensation proceeding the ALJ failed to weigh all of the evidence of record
• holding that by failing to consider medical reports 3 submitted in state workers’ compensation proceeding the ALJ failed to weigh all of the evidence 4 of record
• finding that disability determination by workers’ compensation agency is not binding in social security context
• vacating ALJ’s decision due to failure to consider “medical findings set forth in the medical reports for submission with the worker’s compensation claim”
• “Since the ALJ explicitly disregarded a substantial portion of the medical evidence, the ALJ failed to consider ‘all the evidence’ as is required by [Cotter v. Harris, 642 F.2d 700, 704 (3d Cir.1981)].”
• “[I]t is important to distinguish between those portions of the physicians’ reports that represent the physician[s]’ medical findings and those portions of the reports that represent conclusions as to the claimant’s disability for purposes of worker’s compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).