In re the Marriage of Rodieck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that proxim- ity to extended family weighs in favor of child’s best inter- ests and approving mother’s out-of-state move
• discussing that historically we applied de novo review to 396 J. W. V. v. J. L. W. To the extent that father and stepmother argue that ORS 19.415(3)(a
• explaining that “best interests” of the child is a discretionary standard
• describing best-interests determinations as “case-determining ruling[s]” that we review for abuse of discretion
• a trial court has broad discretion in best interest determinations, is best positioned to consider the relevant factors and reversal is only warranted when a court’s dis- cretionary determination is not a legally permissible one
• a trial court has broad discretion in best interest deter- minations, is best positioned to consider the relevant factors and reversal is only warranted when a court’s discretionary determination is not a legally permissible one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).