In re the Marriage of Petrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “short-term and sporadic” interference with free exercise rights does not violate the First Amendment
• holding that § 1997e(e) does not apply to First Amendment claims regardless of the form of relief sought
• finding that interference with prayer activities did not constitute a substantial burden on inmate’s free exercise of religion
• holding that “[t]he deprivation of First 16 Amendment rights entitles a plaintiff to judicial relief wholly aside from any physical injury he 17 can show, or any mental or emotional injury he may have incurred.”
• explaining that “relatively short-term and sporadic” interference with religious exercise does not amount to a “substantial” burden
• explaining that “relatively short-term and sporadic” interference with religious exercise does not amount to a “substantial” burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).