In re the Marriage of Pearce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that relevant considerations on the first factor include “the possibility of a higher paying job, better schools, and improved general opportunities”
• holding that “[bjecause the Parentage Act contains no provisions requiring that actions for removal be resolved pursuant to section 609 of the Marriage Act, we find that section 609 of the Marriage Act is not implicitly incorporated into the Parentage Act”
• “[t]he presumption in favor of the trial court’s decision is compelling in such cases and should not be disturbed merely because we might arrive at a different conclusion”
• “Because the Parentage Act contains no provisions requiring that actions for removal be resolved pursuant to section 609 of the Marriage Act, we find that section 609 of the Marriage Act is not implicitly incorporated into the Parentage Act”
• ABecause the Parentage Act contains no provisions requiring that actions for removal be resolved pursuant to section 609 of the Marriage Act, we find that section 609 of the Marriage Act is not implicitly incorporated into the Parentage Act@

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).