In re the Marriage of Paullus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Sixth Circuit \does not employ a categorical approach to determining whether a prior conviction constitutes a 'felony drug offense' for purposes of section 841(b)(1)\
• referring to the fulfillment of due process requirements as “the central purpose” of section 851
• “[T]his court does not employ a 22 categorical approach to determining whether a prior conviction constitutes a ‘felony drug offense’ for purposes of section 841(b)(1).”
• “[T]his court does not employ a categorical approach to determining whether a prior conviction constitutes a ‘felony drug offense’ for purposes of section 841(b)(1).”
• “this court does not employ a categorical approach to determining (sic) whether a prior conviction constitutes a ‘felony drug offense’ for purposes of section 841(b)(1).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).