Skip to main content
· 7/1/2005

In Re the Marriage of Okland

Citations

  • 699 N.W.2d 260
  • 2005 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 90
  • 2005 WL 1538238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • utilizing de novo review in consideration of whether a rule 1.904(2) motion was untimely
  • noting the need to seek a ruling by the district court to preserve error
  • stating appellate attorney fees are not a right but instead rest in our discretion
  • utilizing de novo review in consideration of whether a rule 1.904(2) motion was untimely
  • noting one parent “would benefit more from the exemptions than” the other
  • finding equity supports awarding exemptions to the party who would benefit most from it and noting the general rule is “that the parent given primary physical care of the child is entitled to claim the child as a tax exemption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.