Skip to main content
· 3/14/1977

In Re the Marriage of Nicholson

Citations

  • 561 P.2d 1116
  • 17 Wash. App. 110
  • 1977 Wash. App. LEXIS 1541

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the trial court had a right to take the husband's concealment of assets into consideration in dividing the property
  • \The trial court did not abuse its discretion ... when it is considered that the husband's concealment of assets may be taken into account in determining the property division.\
  • “The trial court did not abuse its discretion... when it is considered that the husband’s concealment of assets may be taken into account in determining the property division.”
  • where the court held no abuse of discretion under almost identical facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Andersen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.