In Re the Marriage of Melius v. Melius

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that district court may consider obligee’s ability to meet needs independently through full-time employment
• noting that district court may impute income to an obligor to determine spousal maintenance if it finds the obligor is underemployed in bad faith
• stating that an evidentiary error is not prejudicial unless it might reasonably have influenced the trier of fact and changed the result of the trial
• determining that the district court did not abuse its discretion by including post-separation expenses in wife’s budget, as wife testified credibly about expenses, and they related to the parties’ standard of living during marriage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).