Skip to main content
· 7/23/1998

In Re the Marriage of McNamara

Citations

  • 962 P.2d 330
  • 98 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3905
  • 1998 Colo. App. LEXIS 187
  • 1998 WL 409787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that it is the district court’s responsibility to resolve conflicting evidence as to the child’s best interests
  • recognizing that the court is not required to follow the recommendation of the evaluator and may reach its own conclusions concerning the child’s best interests
  • recognizing that it is the district court’s responsibility to resolve conflicting evidence as to the child’s best interests
  • recognizing that the court is not required to adopt the CFI’s recommendation
  • noting that it’s district court’s responsibility to judge the credibility of witnesses and resolve conflicting evidence
  • remanding for lack of written findings of fact with respect to denial of attorney fees under section 14-10-119

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roy, Ruland, Casebolt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.