Skip to main content
· 12/7/1995

In Re the Marriage of McCadam

Citations

  • 910 P.2d 98
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1741
  • 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 335
  • 1995 WL 717158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where “there [was] no language in the promissory note indicating that the parties agreed the interest would be treated as wife’s separate property,” the interest would be treated as marital property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg, Hume, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.