In re the Marriage of Lahr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an insurer could deny coverage due to \intentional obstructionism in connection with the examination under oath\ where an insured missed an EUO, walked out midway through another EUO, and refused to answer relevant questions at EUOs he attended
• discussing courts’ reluctance to allow insureds the opportunity to cure a breach of their duty to submit to an examination under oath
• insured's failure to share information constituted breach of duty to cooperate and prejudiced insurer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).