In re the Marriage of Johansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that after pleading guilty a party is estopped from asserting his preplea position because \[t]he law will not tolerate a party in a legal proceeding swearing under oath to the untruth of some matter and then swearing under oath to the truth of that same matter\
• finding that after pleading guilty a party is estopped from asserting his preplea position because “[t]he law will not tolerate a party in a legal proceeding swearing under oath to the untruth of some matter and then swearing under oath to the truth of that same matter”
• Fifth District holds that “[e]rratic driving, such as crossing the center line, is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop”
• “Erratic driving, such as crossing the center line, is sufficient to justify an investigatory stop.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).