In Re the Marriage of Huteson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that disability contained no elements of deferred compensation where disability occurred seven months after permanent separation of parties
• questioning both the logic and wisdom of Chase, and holding \To treat ... disability payments as a community asset would unfairly and permanently burden those future earnings to the same extent as would an award of permanent alimony.\
• questioning both the logic and wisdom of Chase, and holding “To treat . . . disability payments as a community asset would unfairly and permanently burden those future earnings to the same extent as would an award of permanent alimony.”
• husband’s disability payment not a divisible marital asset when he had not worked long enough to qualify for retirement pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).