In Re the Marriage of Hudson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Indiana court lacked jurisdiction to distribute the marital property of the parties under Ind. TR. 4 A(A)(T7) because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over one of the spouses
• concluding that the trial court's jurisdiction over the custody proceeding without obtaining in personam jurisdiction over the father did not violate his due process rights and noting that the traditional in rem approach applies to custody cases
• one party’s residence in state provides court with jurisdiction over parties’ marital status, but not to distribute marital assets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).