In re the Marriage of Hebert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the omission of any reference to the courts or judiciary in section 2(a) of FOIA excludes the judiciary from disclosure requirements of FOIA
• explaining that the Act does not narrowly define (or define at all) the “judiciary”
• interpreting the Act’s definition of “public body” as excluding the “judiciary”
• “The lack of any reference to the courts or judiciary must be taken as an intent to exclude the judiciary from the disclosure requirements of [FOIA].”
• “[T]he records in question were judicial records, and the case law provides that such records are subject to disclosure only to the extent that they have been introduced into evidence in court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).