In Re the Marriage of Gensley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding error was not preserved regarding issue only apparent from text of the decree when neither party filed rule 1.904(2) motion
• holding error was not preserved 10 regarding issue only apparent from ruling when no party filed rule 1.904 motion
• recognizing the district court can “listen to and observe the parties and witnesses” and giving weight to the district court’s credibility determinations
• holding error was not preserved regarding issue only apparent from text of the decree after it was issued when neither party filed rule 1.904 motion
• recognizing the district court has the opportunity to “listen to and observe the parties and witnesses” and giving weight to the district court’s credibility determinations
• holding sole legal custody was proper because of father’s inability to communicate with the mother, and children suffered because of acrimonious relationship between parents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).