Skip to main content
· 2/20/1991

In Re the Marriage of Friedman

Citations

  • 466 N.W.2d 689
  • 1991 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 35
  • 1991 WL 19322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating tax consequences are not considered when there is no evidence “a sale was pending” and the district court “has not ordered a sale”
  • noting courts have “divided the appreciated value of assets even when separately held where the increase resulted from the talent, time and effort of the marital partners”
  • “In the case at bar, the problem with considering tax consequences . . . is that there was no evidence that a sale was pending or even contemplated.”
  • length of marriage, disparity of earning capacity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Schultz, Snell, Andreasen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.