In re the Marriage of Fosness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \whether the `overbreadth doctrine' applies to[plaintiffs'] First Amendment challenge is more of a technical academic point than a practical concern\
• noting that “whether the ‘overbreadth doctrine’ applies to [plaintiffs’] First Amendment challenge is more of a technical academic point than a practical concern”
• noting that vagueness may be avoided where “remain” is defined to mean presence
• finding San Diego’s ordinance “problematic” because it did not “provide exceptions for many legitimate activities, with or without parental permission”
• stating that minors’ claims against enforcement 10 of a juvenile curfew ordinance, which made it unlawful for anyone under 18 to “loiter” in 11 public places between certain hours, “would become moot once they reach age 12 eighteen”
• striking down curfew as violation of parental rights based on broad sweep of ordinance and limited exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).