Skip to main content
· 3/18/1999

In Re the Marriage of Eisenhuth

Citations

  • 976 P.2d 896
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1630
  • 1999 Colo. App. LEXIS 62
  • 1999 WL 144227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that while the district court is required to consider the evidence presented to it, it does not act as a surrogate attorney
  • holding that t he district court is required to consider the evidence pres ented to it; it does not act as a surrogate attorney for a party who has chos en not to appear
  • explaining that the district court considers the evidence presented to it
  • noting that the court considers the evidence presented to it
  • noting that the court considers the evidence presented to it
  • district court has broad discretion in dividing marital property; the division must be equitable but need not be mathematically equal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taubman, Metzger, Casebolt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.