· 3/18/1999
In Re the Marriage of Eisenhuth
Citations
- 976 P.2d 896
- 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1630
- 1999 Colo. App. LEXIS 62
- 1999 WL 144227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that while the district court is required to consider the evidence presented to it, it does not act as a surrogate attorney
- holding that t he district court is required to consider the evidence pres ented to it; it does not act as a surrogate attorney for a party who has chos en not to appear
- explaining that the district court considers the evidence presented to it
- noting that the court considers the evidence presented to it
- noting that the court considers the evidence presented to it
- district court has broad discretion in dividing marital property; the division must be equitable but need not be mathematically equal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taubman, Metzger, Casebolt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.