Skip to main content
· 5/28/2024

In re the Marriage of: Daniela Tate v. Daniel Lee Tate

Syllabus

In this dissolution-of-marriage dispute, appellant-father argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion by awarding respondent-mother $1,585 per month in permanent spousal maintenance and (2) exceeded its authority under Minn. R. Civ. P. 52.02 by altering provisions of its prior findings that were not challenged by father's motion for amended findings. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.