In re the Marriage of Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant's \financial stake in the outcome of the negotiations constituted proof of his interest in furthering the goals of the conspiracy\
• denying new trial based on purported variance between indictment’s single conspiracy and multiple conspiracies proved at trial because evidence supported conviction
• “Where the government contends that the defendant personally negotiated to produce a contested quantity of drugs, the proof must demonstrate that the defendant intended to produce such an amount.”
• “Absent evidence other than [defendant’s] own post-arrest assertion that he intended to commit a robbery, the sentencing court was justified in relying on [defendant’s] pre-arrest promises to deliver five kilograms of cocaine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).