In Re the Marriage of Ciesluk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the court erred by denying a motion to relocate when it prematurely concluded that the parties should remain in close proximity to each other
• holding the court must balance the right to travel, the right to parent, and the best 14 interests of the child in a relocation request
• recognizing legislative elimination of presumption and applying best interests standard under Colorado law
• finding direct benefits to the child from “the stability of remaining with his majority time parent” and “day-to-day relationships” with family
• reviewing “[a] best interests determination under subsection 14– 10–129(2)(c),” C.R.S. 2004, “for an abuse of discretion”
• “[T]he issue in relocation cases is the extent to which the parents’ needs and desires are intertwined with the child’s best interests.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).