Skip to main content
· 2/21/1997

In re the Marriage of Bouault

Citations

  • 84 Wash. App. 1111
  • 1997 Wash. App. LEXIS 2789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • setting forth this standard in the context of a USERRA discrimination claim
  • followed by Hance v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 571 F.3d 511, 518 (6th Cir. 2009)
  • “[C]laimants must show evi- dence of discrimination other than the fact of non-selection and membership in the protected class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.