· 4/21/2005
In Re the Marriage of Bolding-Roberts
Citations
- 113 P.3d 1265
- 2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 589
- 2005 WL 913548
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that “the child would have enjoyed the benefit of both parents’ incomes, as well as the subsidy” had parents not separated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Plank, Davidson, Ney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.