· 5/17/1984
In Re the Marriage of Blankenship
Citations
- 682 P.2d 1354
- 210 Mont. 31
- 1984 Mont. LEXIS 929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that workers’ compensation benefits may or may not be a marital estate asset depending on whether, and to what extent, those benefits were compensation for wage loss during the marriage, post-dissolution wage loss or loss of earning capacity, “or some other purpose”
- by implication; Supreme Court remanded for findings as to purpose and terms of workers’ compensation award
- to determine if settlement of workers' compensation claim is marital property, must know purpose of award, and when it began.
- to determine if settlement of workers’ compensation claim is marital property, must know purpose of award, and when it began.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haswell, Harrison, Shea, Sheehy, Gulbrandson, Morrison, Weber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.