Skip to main content
· 5/17/1984

In Re the Marriage of Blankenship

Citations

  • 682 P.2d 1354
  • 210 Mont. 31
  • 1984 Mont. LEXIS 929

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that workers’ compensation benefits may or may not be a marital estate asset depending on whether, and to what extent, those benefits were compensation for wage loss during the marriage, post-dissolution wage loss or loss of earning capacity, “or some other purpose”
  • by implication; Supreme Court remanded for findings as to purpose and terms of workers’ compensation award
  • to determine if settlement of workers' compensation claim is marital property, must know purpose of award, and when it began.
  • to determine if settlement of workers’ compensation claim is marital property, must know purpose of award, and when it began.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haswell, Harrison, Shea, Sheehy, Gulbrandson, Morrison, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.