In Re the Marriage of Bidwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that written settlement communications between attorneys on behalf of two mediating parties were confidential “mediation communications” under ORS 36.220
• holding that written settlement commu- nications between attorneys on behalf of two mediating par- ties were confidential “mediation communications” under ORS 36.220
• holding that written settlement communications between attorneys on behalf of two mediating parties were confidential “media- tion communications” under ORS 36.220
• holding that a party’s use of settlement negotiation evidence was entered “for another purpose” within the meaning of the Oregon equivalent of Rule 408 when that party entered settlement negotiation evidence to establish liability for attorney fees
• evidence of letters sent during settlement negotiations, offered to prove that a party did not pursue settlement in objectively reasonable manner for purposes of attorney fee claim, was not offered to “prove liability for or invalidity of’ claims for purpose of OEC 408

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).