In re the Marriage of Appelqvist

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 2 that the state proceeding is ongoing, even assuming that the administrative proceeding is 3 final and state-court review had not begun
• finding that “[subsequent judicial review is a sufficient opportunity” for review of federal claims
• finding that review of constitutional claims by way of a petition to the state court constituted “subsequent judicial review” and was sufficient opportunity to raise federal claims for the purposes of Younger
• “That the regulation and licensing of healthcare professionals is an important matter of state concern is beyond dispute.”
• “For purposes of Younger abstention, administrative proceedings are ‘judicial in nature’ when they are coercive — i.e., state enforcement proceedings .... ”
• for Younger abstention purposes, administrative proceedings are judicial in nature when they are coercive, such as state enforcement proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).