Skip to main content
· 7/6/2000

In Re the Marriage of Antuna

Citations

  • 8 P.3d 589
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4136
  • 2000 Colo. App. LEXIS 1176
  • 2000 WL 890413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the sufficiency and credibility of valuation evidence, including the weight to be given to an expert’s techniques, is within the district court’s province
  • husband’s acceptance of a court-ordered payment did not constitute a waiver of his right to appeal
  • no abuse of discretion in allowing rebuttal expert to testify despite claimed noncompliance with C.R.C.P. 26 disclosure requirement
  • the husband’s acceptance of a court- ordered payment did not constitute a waiver of his right to appeal
  • no abuse of discretion in failing to impose sanctions for failure to adhere strictly to C.R.C.P. 26.2, even where the issues were merely financial ones not impacting custody
  • no abuse of discretion in failing to impose sanctions for failure to adhere strictly to C.R.C.P. 26.2, even where the issues were merely financial ones not impacting custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Marquez, Dailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.