In Re the Lynd Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that date of notice could be implied from trial court’s order granting new trial
• holding that absent an extension of post-judgment deadlines under rule 306a, the trial court's plenary power expires thirty days after the judgment is signed
• holding that absent a trial court’s express finding that a party received late notice of the judgment, a finding should be implied by the court’s granting of a motion for new trial
• stating that the procedural timetables and the trial court’s plenary power run from the date of the trial court’s final judgment unless a party complies with the requirements of rule 306a(5
• emphasizing that non-prevailing party does not forfeit right to appeal denial of suppression motion by failing to request findings of fact and conclusions of law and that the absence of findings would impact only the standard of review
• emphasizing that non-prevailing party does not forfeit right to appeal denial of suppression motion by failing to request findings of fact and conclusions of law and that the absence of findings would impact only the standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).