Skip to main content
· 6/23/1992

In Re the Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights of Matsock

Citations

  • 611 A.2d 737
  • 416 Pa. Super. 520
  • 1992 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1696

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[a]s a result of his steadfast denial of the alleged abuse, [father] was terminated from two different court-ordered sexual abuse therapy programs. … Thus, since he did not complete the therapy programs, [father] is considered an ‘untreated sexual offender.’”
  • stating, “[t]hus, in termination proceedings based on paragraph (a)(5), such as the one here, the needs and welfare of the child must be considered twice; once under subsection (a), and if all five requirements of subsection (a) are met, then again under subsection (b)”
  • “Thus, in termination proceedings based on paragraph (a)(5), such as the one here, the needs and welfare of the child must be considered twice; once under subsection (a), and if all five requirements of subsection (a) are met, then again under subsection (b).”
  • applying this reasoning to (a)(5)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Cirillo, Brosky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.