Skip to main content
· 11/8/2006

In Re the Guardianship of Knepper

Citations

  • 856 N.E.2d 150
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2322
  • 2006 WL 3210450

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “when a fiduciary relationship exists and the fiduciary benefits from a questioned transaction, a presumption of undue influence arises and the burden shifts to the fiduciary to rebut the presumption”
  • recognizing that “when a fiduciary relationship exists and the fiduciary benefits from a questioned transaction, a presumption of undue influence arises and the burden shifts to the fiduciary to rebut the presumption”
  • holding that a fiduciary may rebut the presumption of undue influence by establishing clear and convincing evidence that “she acted in good faith, did not take advantage of her position of trust, and that the transaction was fair and equitable”
  • beneficiary rebutted presumption of undue influence; there was no evidence of bad faith by beneficiary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Vaidik, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.