· 10/12/2000
Federal Case
Citations
- 229 F.3d 790
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11115
- 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20220
- 2001 A.M.C. 49
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8347
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 25348
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that cede-back agreements are enforceable and should not be revealed to a jury
- \[T]he general policy of federal courts to promote settlement before trial is even stronger in the context of largescale class actions.\
- “Far from being unethical, cede back agreements make it easier to administer mandatory class actions for the assessment of punitive damages and encourage settlement in mass tort cases.”
- “The proportionate share approach is the law in the Ninth Circuit, has been adopted by the Supreme Court for use in maritime actions, and is the approach recommended by the American Law Institute”
- “It is uniformly held that absent exceptional circumstances, a jury deliberating on the amount of a damages award is not to consider where the funds that constitute that award will come from, or where they will end up.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.