· 12/12/1996
Federal Case
Citations
- 102 F.3d 429
- 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 964
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 14861
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that plaintiffs' total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
- noting that plaintiffs’ total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
- noting that plaintiffs' total refusal to provide 24 discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
- noting that plaintiffs’ total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
- Terminating sanctions are a severe remedy and should be imposed only “where the violation is due to willfulness, bad faith, or fault of the party.”
- dismissal under Rule 37(b) requires a threshold showing that 6 the violation is due to willfulness, bad faith, or fault of the non-moving party
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.