Skip to main content
· 12/12/1996

Federal Case

Citations

  • 102 F.3d 429
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 964
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 14861
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8961
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that plaintiffs' total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
  • noting that plaintiffs’ total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
  • noting that plaintiffs' total refusal to provide 24 discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
  • noting that plaintiffs’ total refusal to provide discovery obstructed resolution of their claims on the merits
  • Terminating sanctions are a severe remedy and should be imposed only “where the violation is due to willfulness, bad faith, or fault of the party.”
  • dismissal under Rule 37(b) requires a threshold showing that 6 the violation is due to willfulness, bad faith, or fault of the non-moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.